Become a Member

Get access to more than 30 brands, premium video, exclusive content, events, mapping, and more.

Already have an account? Sign In

Become a Member

Get access to more than 30 brands, premium video, exclusive content, events, mapping, and more.

Already have an account? Sign In

Brands

Standard Issue: Rounding Down

Why the 31.8-millimeter handlebar was never meant to be.


Lock Icon

Become a member to unlock this story and receive other great perks.

Already have an Outside Account? Sign in

Outside+ Logo

All Access
40% off Season Streamings Sale
$1.14 / week*

  • A $500 value with everything in the Print + Digital Plan plus 25+ benefits including:
  • Member-only content on all 17 publications in the Outside network like Outside, SKI, VeloNews, Trail Runner and more
  • Trailforks PRO access with a database of over 300k mountain bike trails.
  • Premium access to Outside TV Shows, Films, and documentaries
  • Annual gear guides for cycling, camping, skiing, climbing, and more
  • Exclusive discounts on gear, travel, and race-entry fees
  • Annual subscription to Outside magazine
Join Outside+
Beta MTB

Print + Digital
50% Off Holiday Sale
$0.50 / week*

  • Annual subscription to Beta MTB magazine
  • Access to all member-exclusive content on BETAmtb.com
  • Ad-free access to BETAmtb.com
Join Beta MTB

*Outside memberships are billed annually. Print subscriptions available to U.S. residents only. You may cancel your membership at anytime, but no refunds will be issued for payments already made. Upon cancellation, you will have access to your membership through the end of your paid year. More Details

The 25.4mm bar clamp diameter made sense. Sure, it wasn’t optimal–or even adequate–for what mountain bikes grew up to be. But the number 25.4 made sense because 25.4mm is exactly one inch. Or, it has been since 1959 when the world agreed to stretch what we then called an inch by .000044 millimeters to get a clean 25.4. The 31.8mm clamp diameter does not make sense; 31.8 is close to one-and-a-quarter inch, but apparently, that has nothing to do with it.

“How 31.8 came about was an absolute fluke,” says Gavin Michael Vos. Vos is one of those people who you’ve probably never heard of, but our sport would not be the same without. He lives in Taiwan where he runs, among other things, Spank Industries, The Gravity Cartel, Fratelli Industries and An- vil Industries. As we spoke over WhatsApp, I could hear an orchestra of voices in the background, punctuated by the sounds of heavy equipment, slamming doors and the unmistakable clang of metal tubing hitting concrete. After 35 years in the industry, Vos still prefers to be close to the action.

“We started selling mountain bikes out of our surf shop in the mid to late ’80s,” he says. Vos grew up in South Africa and went on to help build one of the strongest mountain biking scenes on the planet. “We brought a team to the World Champs in France in 1993, and in 1997 we had the first World Cup race in Cape Town.”

Later, Vos founded Funn, a component brand focused exclusively on freeride and DH. It was a pivotal time in the industry. “All the frames became oversized, the Kleins, the Proflexes, the Cannondales. A 25.4 handle- bar just looked so puny.” So, Funn designed a bar with the very late-90s name Fatboy Slim. “The handlebar was supposed to be 32mm. It looked good on paper with the 32mm stanchion size emerging.” So, they set to work.

Before bars are bent to create rise and sweep, they are shaped through butting and swaging. Butting is the manipulation of a tube’s wall thickness and swaging is the manipulation of its diameter. But that’s over- simplifying it.

 

“All the frames became oversized, the Kleins, the Proflexes, the Cannondales. A 25.4 handle- bar just looked so puny.”

 

“There’s a lot of kung fu,” as Vos puts it. “You end up working the material, and you put it un- der a lot of stress. Then, when you bend, you get expansion and contraction, outside and inside, and that causes some form of distortion on the material. You have something called ‘orange peel,’ which is a wrinkling. We had to increase the wall thickness so we could grind away the faults.” Going from 25.4 to the 22.2mm at the grips was relatively easy, but from 32mm was uncharted territory. “This is more of an understanding than a strict engineering discipline. It is quite manual to some degree.”

Eventually, they produced a bar that had the right shape, wall thickness and finish, and went into production, expecting to create the first 32mm bar. But that’s not how it went. “Our first 250 or 500 bars had all suffered some shrinkage, which was just a flaw in our manufacturing … but we hadn’t machined our stems yet.”

Thus, 31.8 was born. Vos can’t point to a specific reason why the Fatboy Slim gained enough of a following to launch a new standard. There was a competing oversized bar at the time from Azonic, but it used a clumsy three-piece design instead of tapering, which actually makes sense now. Also, it was called the Chubby.
Ironically, Vos is skeptical of new stan- dards. “I think it’s the industry stretching to create interest among consumers. A lot of these things are meaningless, and create a lot of waste.” But 31.8 is not meaningless. It has clearly made an impact on how we ride. A measurable impact.